From WikiWorld

Jump to: navigation, search

Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary

The universe, so far as we can understand or describe it, must be in the set of universal logical systems. When we reduce experience back to basic measurement devoid of interpretation we find a universe composed of quantum events on the microcosm. Somehow these basic quantum events add up to manifest all the fields and forces of physics, but at the bottom layer, there is only the exchange of quantum state change information.

We now know solidity of ordinary objects and the repulsions and attractions of the ordinary world are manifestations equivalent to the refusal or occupation of quantum state space (4 dimensional Hilbert space) of electrons as discovered by Heisenberg from the experimental data alone. The measurements are consistent with random samplings of ballistic electrons in a discrete 4 dimensional space though we are only certain of their probabilistic behavior. These four dimensional state spaces are loosely connected in that they map in to our 3 dimensional perceptions. Objects have a hidden inner dimension. Real quantum differentials not only attract and repel (add and subtract), they can also be perceived at being independent, and manifest another dimension.

The experience model is not designed, it is a given by our measurement. Measurement reveals the propagation of state change information. Time or direction is not inherent in individual state changes. This is clear in TheCaseOfTheElectronCollision. Perspective determines whether differences are perceived in parallel as space or in serial as changes manifesting time. Relativity is emergent considering all possible participants. The classical emerges from considering only participants in a similar reference frame to our own



If the universe is equivalent to an information processor, as Wolfram| suggests, then the dimensionality of the universe must be equivalent to the dimensionality of the information processes defined by the number of variables. In the QuantumEventTimeSpace model time is manifest by absolute event orderings and space by relative orderings.

Quantum Differentials

By quantum, I mean binary. They are binary distinctions from uniformity, indeed that makes them dialectal. But it is not clear how collaborative participatory existence is subsumed in that realm. Existence in philosophy may be some sort of steganogramic of physical existence but what physics is interested in is nature of existence with respect to measurement.

Quantum differential represents the unit action or difference manifest by a unit state change. Wojciech Zurek and Anton Zeilinger showed these correspond to single bit measurements, higher or lower, faster or slower, hotter or colder. We get to answer as many questions as we have quantum differentials. Further, only the questions that are answered are manifest. They represent the basic stuff of both the universe, and of information itself, making them the natural bases for information physics.

Systems of these are what we ultimately perceive rather than independent quanta. The structure is arbitrary as long as universal computing is manifest in the model as in the universe. The simplest bottom layer consistent with experience is differentials adding or canceling in a common dimension, or defining an independent dimension.

A binary differential can be conceived or perceived as a dialectal, a Yin Yang, a bit, or a line segment of indeterminate length as it manifests the most basic logical dimension.

Quantum differentials perceived (received) in parallel bisect space manifesting position, when perceived serially they manifest local time. In either case the energy is the total count of the quanta. The properties and "view" of the receiver determine whether a signal will be received in a space time fabric that is not infinite, but is composed of discrete events. Events create space and time one spoke at a time propagating a state change in a failed annihilation, defining a synchronization of local clocks in the fabric of event orderings and then disappearing forever.


All that exists, scientifically, is that which we can perceive or measure. All we perceive is the history of events reaching us. If we follow event histories back half way to the big bang, we find evidence of a gazillion events, half way again we find another gazillion. Each time we go half way back another gazillion in an apparently infinite event history. But ultimately as we go back information is missing, it is not that it is really gone, it is just so obfuscated that it is irretrievable. At any time there could be some earliest known event and no way to know if an earlier event might not be found. Synthetically we can make both finite and infinite models of what came before their earliest known event. They are equivalent and there is no scientific means, outside Occam's razor, to choose between them. See InformationCosmology.

We cannot say our own universe’s history is finite, but we can safely presume the universe manifests only a finite history and finite models exist.

And likewise the perfect information decoder does not exist, the universe, at best, can manifest just a good solution.

We can't say for sure there are no infinities anywhere, but both nature and science abhor such singularities. Our only source of information is via discrete events. If there were infinities we could never see them so there is no point considering them. When they do pop up in our math we have to renormalize.

But it is the physics, not the philosophy of existence that is today's challenge. Existence in philosophy may be some sort of steganogramic of physical existence but what physics is interested in is nature of existence with respect to measurement.

The classical emerges from the quantum as a sort of democracy of participants in a participatory existence. The perspectives manifest are those that happen to be propagated among some group of participants. Existence is a matter of perspective.

An observer is merely a participant who witnesses an event and passed on the information about the event. A participant manifests a listening for frequency ranges enabling an event in the past to be determined. The listening may be thought of as a manifestation of a decoder. Quantum decoders work perfectly but only for specific frequencies. The universe itself is the union of all information decoders and will ultimately decode most any signal. It is indeed a good approximation of the ideal information decoder.


As perception of BinaryDifferentials depends on ReferenceFrame, they have no inherent size or direction in time and space, a locality time wise is a light path or information transfer. These manifest the only fabric of time and space there is. Localities are potentially HUGE and they often define time and space on a grand scale. Only if we try to separate light paths into multiple separate localities do we have weird correlations at a distance that seem faster than light.

Reference Frames

In the experience model, perspectives are called reference frames. These may be represented as light cones. A light cone consist of a past cone and future cone joined at the point of the here and now. The past maps the space and time of possible events we can receive (at the speed of light) in the present. The future cone maps the time and space (at the speed of light) we can effect in the future. They are our window of observation and effect. As we move through time and space our cone moves with us, changing our observational window and future possibilities.

Every point in space at any time may be represented by a light cone. But only those cones representing actual participants in the universe can be said to exist. In addition, the cones represent possibilities, the only part of the cones that are actually manifest are the discrete change communication event spikes that actually occur where the cones of two objects intersect. The event spikes themselves are all that we actually perceive and are sufficient to understand all that we perceive including space and time.

Further, when change information is received, it is annihilated and no longer exists manifesting the attraction of two reference frames because space and time are composed of these events. And when the change is propagated into the future space and time are created manifesting a repulsion of the reference frame of the sender and receiver and the creation of time and space for the interval until it is received and annihilated.

TheCaseOfTheElectronCollision shows that reference frame determines whether differences are perceived in parallel as space or in serial as changes manifesting time. The exchange of photons does not inherently have a specific direction in time. This begs the question of how time itself emerges and how the speed of light emerges as a constant.

Consider a set of primitive exchange of discrete state change information among some number of participants generating a directed unit graph of events for each participant. Each participant experiences and propagates change information in a particular order, the received signal is annihilated before the translated signal is propagated and events occur in a particular order. In this way each participant is a discrete independent clock. At the same time, independent events occurring between independent participants have no definite time ordering with respect to these events. But the ordering perceived by any participant cannot be contradicted by any other participant as the received information is annihilated before the propagated information is generated.

In TheCaseOfTheElectronCollision, a spike, or spoke of timespace is generated. The imaginary light cones of the two electrons seem to repel each other as each shifts across into a receding reference frame. Although they share a tick of the cosmic clock they then manifest their independence in a linear increasing fashion. These velocities create space by separating light cones.

Space and Time

We can start with 2 dimensional photons, traversing time orderings defining a 3 dimensional space. Photons are a manifestation of interacting electrons and positrons. In our world electrons interacting manifest our perceptions by two-dimensional changes in a 4 dimensional state space propagating indefinitely. The sum of these events manifests space and time, as we know it. The change information is relayed from place to place being absorbed and emitted. The constantly changing web of information flow defines a fluid space and time that is constantly recreating itself. Relative ordering of events define space. Absolute orderings (all relevant observers agree) manifests time. As one travels past events through space, they cross perspectives into the future. Traveling one light year moves your perspective forward one year.



Participants in our collaborative existence are objects with non-zero rest mass. They are manifested by discrete spikes on a hypothetical LightCones. They manifest a four dimensional Hilbert state space but only three dimension are existent externally. We can understand this internal hidden dimension in the information model as internal communications that are not manifest to the external universe. This happen because all quantum communications are private and secret. It is only be seeing the net effect that the chain of communications may be deduced. When a system changes state internally and that state is not measured by some outside interaction, the event is manifest as internal time space, not external time space.


When you press on an object, the stubborn refusal of the electrons to occupy the same state is evident. Enough events are generated to prevent your hand from entering the object. Yet the space created by these events is not manifest unless we press hard enough to move the object. It is not so evident that the space between objects that are not touching is also manifest by events between them. Electrons exclude one another and define state space at any distance where their light cones intersect. State change information is delayed across space as relative differences. Acceleration is manifest by space being created or destroyed on one side of an object thus changing its reference frame.


Events destroy past space and time while creating space and time that does not yet exist. Objects are complex logical systems which receive relative changes at the zero point energy (ZPE, ~175 Gev) in addition to that from apparent sources. The generative effects of the [[Zero Point Energy|]] cancel out from the perspective of our realm. The consumption (loss to our perspective/realm) of old space and time manifests as gravity. At its surface the earth consumes 32 feet of time space every second, manifesting acceleration.


2 dimensional electrons manifest a constant charge and a relative spin manifesting a sort of overlapping up space and down space. Two dimension is insufficient to define a three dimensional position. Two electrons however are capable of occupying a state in a four dimensional space. The charge and spin dimension of each is linked respectively to a positive charge and opposite spin dimension internal to the object. The two dimensional electron convey only state change information in two dimensions, not absolute state values. If we align electron spin, as in a magnet, creating an imbalance, we in effect define the absence of populated states. The definition (manifestation) of three dimensional space requires that electrons of opposite spin occupy the same state. Two objects, with a predominance of spin aligned in one direction are unable to populate the state space defining the space between them, resulting in the contraction of space we call magnetic attraction, opposite spins define state space manifesting expansion of state space or repulsion. If we have excess similar charge in two objects they define more space and repel. It we have opposite charge they re unable to populate the state space defining the space between them, resulting in the contraction of space, or attraction.

The population or evacuation of a state by an electron, manifests a change in charge and a change in spin in that state. As we see in semiconductor physics, the absence of an electron (electron hole) has equivalent properties to a positron. There are two equivalent perspectives. Which is manifest depends on the perspective of the receiver.

Propagation of Light

Differences are imbalances that the universe is apparently compelled to eliminate. This manifest actions and reactions in our world. When an atom receives state change information from the distant past, it is compelled to undo that change and that change is sent back toward the ghost of the change that was received. But the sender of that change is from the past and the propagated change is in the future. It is by a trick of time that the differences are never balanced.

Space is full of Zero Point Energy (ZPE) consisting of event orderings coming from every direction. Imbalances in the [[Zero Point Energy|]] are generated in response to state occupation and evacuation in objects which propagate across time orderings by continually to filling in the holes "perceived". This is equivalent to propagation of virtual electron positron pairs through time until an object receptive to the state change internalizes (receives, absorbs) the change. We cannot know the effect of the entire universe at one point exactly without knowing the state of the entire universe. Such knowledge would require more states than are contained in the universe.

Thus we cannot know the exact path an electron positron chain will take in space. We must consider it to be a randomized approximation of a straight line. When an object is encountered, either a virtual electron or virtual positron will communicate the relative state change as an opposite change in the receiver. The alternative directions of the change manifest the alternating or wave properties of light. Each virtual particle potentially doubles the possible perspectives on the event but there is but one discrete exchange outcome.


From the experience model alone we can reconcile general relativity and quantum electrodynamics. To discover the world of neutrinos, the double slit experiment, protons and neutrons we investigate the SyntheticModel of QuantumEventTimeSpace.

Someday, experiments may reveal one dimensional neutrinos clearly enough to make them part of the experience model, for now they are still part of the theoretical hidden internal world of the quantum that cannot be experienced. We can make synthetic models that seem to work, but never know if they are correct.

[[|http://www.quantum.univie.ac.at/links/newscientist/bit.html]], TruthAboutLight, TruthAboutMagetism, Truth About Gravity In the beginning was the bit

Personal tools