WikiWorld

From WikiWorld

Jump to: navigation, search
WE choose to be part of a CollectiveIntelligence here at 
WikiWorld and through all our connections everywhere. 
---JimScarver

*we* are motivated to turning the CollectiveStupidity of the WE into a truly intelligent CollectiveIntelligence, and thereby uplift humanity.

To meet this goal, we embrace the exchange of ideas, the synthesis of knowledge, and creating whatever tools are necessary to faciliate this. WikiWorldManagement is all of us who share this objective.

Contents

Our Purpose

WikiWorld is an experiment and demonstration of a virtual collaborative community fostering our CollectiveIntelligence using a collaborative authoring environment.

At WikiWorld WE rule. Anyone may say what they think and it is consensus by default. Visit WikiWorldVirtualClassroom for help.

*we* are motivated to turning the CollectiveStupidity of the WE into a truly intelligent CollectiveIntelligence, and thereby uplift humanity. To meet this goal, we embrace the exchange of ideas, the synthesis of knowledge, and creating whatever tools are necessary to faciliate this. WikiWorldManagement is all of us who share this objective.


How WE Become

WE are emerging CollectiveIntelligence, different from what WE were. Growth requires that we recognize how what may have been right at one time to believe, is changing in the evolution of civilization and what truths we are losing that continue to be relevant in the emerging new civilization. (Link to discussion truths losing related to the text:what truths we are losing that continue to be relevant in the emerging new civilization)

Why WE Become

WE are a multi-national collaboration applying our shared principles, reason and resources toward a better tomorrow of sustained growth such that we may live TheGoodLife in our own way according to our SocialContract.

Who is the WE?

The WE is made of everyone, every single human, that has, is, and will be communicating with their fellow humans. That's one very large CollectiveIntelligence. Large collective intelligences have their problems (namely, CollectiveStupidity).

However, *we* at WikiWorld believe that it is possible to uplift the WE, through our and others actions, so that all living humans may live TheGoodLife. As such, we seek knowledge, dialog, and ideas to help enable this dream to come true.

What we are not

WE are not impersonal. WE are not a grand cacophony of ideas mixed together like chopsuey. Our symphonic euphony is the combination of the unified voice of the entire orchestra punctuated by solos and duets of our individuals. WE often quote great individuals, particularly ourselves, exemplifing and personalizing the scope and limits of what WE share.


只要我的存在,我就存在。

What WE are becoming

You will often see talk involving an idealized WE. This is a reference to a future WE that is smart enough to enable each of its component parts (us humans) to live to their fullest ability, creating synergy and FutureValue for all. This ConciousEvolution of humanity is a dream not yet manifest. Instead this WE acts as an "unseen hand" that creates emerging order in the WE unconcious. Self awareness of this WE requires that individuals learn to let FutureValue to be our guide, rather then short term greed, and ZeroSumGame thinking.

It is not a collective where we equitably distribute some shared notion of TheGoodLife. Instead it not only recognizes that ones person's poison is another medicine, and one person's garbage is another treasure, in a realm of CooperativeDiversity, it capitalizes on that fact by encouraging and cherishing the diversity of our individuals.

This usage of WE pervades JimScarver's writing here.

There is a simpler "we" connotation implied here. It is the *we*, and refers to the active people, here and elsewhere, working towards the uplifting of the WE. It works out to be synonymous with WikiWorld. That is, after all, WikiWorld's cause primus.

See Also

WE NetworkTheory, SocialContract, KnowledgeManagement, HomePage, WikiWiki

Personal tools